I would like the 2013 owners to chip in and tell us your transmission experiences.
Unless your 51k was a typo, your transmission is still under warranty as part of your powertrain coverage up to 5 years or 60,000 miles:I've started to notice a sputtering on my 2012 Focus Titanium. It's happening frequently from a stand still and it only seems to stutter from 1st to 2nd gear. I purchased the car in Feb 2012, so the car is less than 2 years old. I have about 51K miles on it, so my car is out of warranty.
My question is, what's the best way to handle this ? Should Ford be paying for this or should I be contacting a lawyer/class action suit ? I'm sure when I take the car to my local dealer, he'll try to charge me an arm and a leg to fix the issue, but I don't think I should be paying for a clutch or transmission or anything when a car is less than 2 years old.
Please advise...
MrSxy4Ever
Yessir, I took your meaning.Yep. Kinda' what I meant by "a long wait".
No, I called you a malcontent for you stating that you were going to post on each and every post you can telling people that this car is crap (and not the trans - the entire car) and that you would continue to do this until Ford recalled all of the 2012 Focus for this problem.3-4 out of ten wow.
I have been referred to as a malcontent for saying its far, far less.
and you heard this from a service writer working for Ford.
If by "IM" you meant "PM", instructions are in post #467. (That took me a while to figure out the first time, too.)... I don't know how to IM Crystal, not that she can get me out of the car. ...
You might feel a little better if you ignore that last $1,300. That's just the cost of not having to ride the bus or take taxis. Owning any comparable car would cost you something close to that. Except, of course, the time you had to do without it because it was in the shop. (I don't recall if the dealer gave you a loaner.) That other $4,800 you can think of as being part of the rising cost of education so it doesn't feel like a total waste.I checked with Ford Credit.
To dump the lease, I have to pay the whole thing...or the difference between the wholesale value (determined by my dealer) and the amount I owe, which is essentially the purchase price minus two payments or $23,800.
Well, my guess is the wholesale value is about $19,000 so I would have to pony up $4800.[bigcry] That on top of the $1300 I have in it to drive it 2700 miles. ...
The Consumer Reports reliability ratings in the April 2013 issue for the 2012 Focus are a little different than you recalled. Also, even though CR's ratings do come from people who actually own the cars being rated, it's still hard to tell how objective or accurate they are.It is hard to tell, but one piece of objective evidence comes from Consumer Reports. Iirc, In its last vehicle reliability issue the Focus rated "worse than average" (not "much worse than average") in "Transmission-minor" problems and "Average" in "Transmission-major". This suggests there are issues, but not issues effecting a large percentage of Focuses.
Nobody knows but Ford ...
Thanks for correcting my memory about the "Trans Major" rating. While we don't know the problem rate, if it were anything close to some of the comments here (e.g. 4 out of 10 have issues), there would be "much worse than average" dots in both Trans major and minor. And I agree CR ratings probably make problems seem worse than they really are.The Consumer Reports reliability ratings in the April 2013 issue for the 2012 Focus are a little different than you recalled. Also, even though CR's ratings do come from people who actually own the cars being rated, it's still hard to tell how objective or accurate they are.
As with comments on this forum, if owners with complaints are more likely to speak up, then CR's data could make a problem appear worse than it actually is. First, the survey respondents have to be CR subscribers, and second, they have to choose to respond to the survey. Not a very random sampling. Someone who knows more about statistics than I do would have to say how much that can affect the results but it makes me as unsure about them as any other indications we have.
Reports from the owners of 2013s the OP asked about won't show up until next April. It will be interesting to see whether they show an improvement from the 2012s for the trans, and whether the rest of the car still does as good as the 2012s did.
For whatever they're worth, the CR reliability survey results for the 2012 Ford Focus had the worst rating, "much worse than average" (solid black dot) for the category "Trans minor". One other category, "Audio system", had the same worst rating. They really stood out because twelve of the other categories had the best possible rating of "Much better than average" (solid red dots). This included "Trans major". The remaining two, "Body integrity " and "Body hardware", were just one step down from the best at "Better than average" (half red dot).
I don't know how to interpret the "Much better than average" rating for "Trans major". It seems like taking a transmission out to replace clutches and seals would be "Major", not "Minor". The driveability problems caused by bad clutches (loss of acceleration, lunging) also seem to make the problem more "major" than "minor", but maybe their definitions are different. [scratch]
Major or minor, we still can't tell from CR's ratings what percentage of all Focuses really are affected -- just the ones reported by CR subscribers. From what I've read about MSN auto reliability data, it also measures something different than what we want to know. I agree with the very first part of your comment and this:
I checked with Ford Credit.
To dump the lease, I have to pay the whole thing...or the difference between the wholesale value (determined by my dealer) and the amount I owe, which is essentially the purchase price minus two payments or $23,800.
Well, my guess is the wholesale value is about $19,000 so I would have to pony up $4800.[bigcry] That on top of the $1300 I have in it to drive it 2700 miles.
Oh, woe is me. I am %ÂĄ$&@%! Done like toast it seems.
The car currently grinds at shift 1-2, and at 2-3 and has the trailer hitching issue as well as poor down shifting and only really works well if I am aggressive on the gas (getting fewer mpg).
I don't know how to IM Crystal, not that she can get me out of the car.
[:0][bigcry][whip][scream][smackbum]
... and flew with it. [thumb]Yessir, I took your meaning.
Sent from my Galaxy Note 2 using FF Mobile.
Me, too. I think I read their explanation for how that works once, but don't recall it making any sense to me even then. Maybe it's weighted so that certain categories have more influence on the overall rating for the car? The bad part about that is that if someone has a Mk3 Focus with a manual transmission and no MFT their car's reputation gets smeared in the eyes of any buyers who don't know the background.... I don't understand either how CR overall ratings work. One would think a few exceptionally good marks would offset one or two bad ones... But apparently not.
It seems to me that getting a lower mpg is a better option if it allows the transmission to shift properly? Or maybe I misread something?I checked with Ford Credit.
The car currently grinds at shift 1-2, and at 2-3 and has the trailer hitching issue as well as poor down shifting and only really works well if I am aggressive on the gas (getting fewer mpg).