Awesome and Thank you iminhell.
I will pick this up in a new thread in the FF Tuning Area. I will make that new thread either today or it might wait a few days because of other work & fun plans.
Before I leave, I wanted to hit a few items or ask a question here anyway... I had previously dl LiveLink 6.5 on this PC. Earlier today I dl (by your link above) LiveLink Gen-II v2.1 on a different PC. Based on ur comments, I am guessing Gen-II is better for my needs right? So do you recommend that I delete 6.5 and then install Gen-II?
Using Torque as a datalogger sucks butthole. <-That phrase is something my 11 year old son picked up, -nice, uhgg. Anyway, csv files created by Torque do not open up in LiveLink (Gen-II or 6.5) or not until after some manual tweaking of the csv is done. After comparison of a csv file created by an SCT device verses one created by Torque, I found that if I add a left most column (using Excel) titled "Time (sec)" the Torque csv file will then open using LiveLink. After the Time column is added, actual times must also be entered in each of the respective cells.
Lastly, some PIDs that are common in a SCT "Duratec-Log-List" are not available and/or are not being recorded by Torque, which sucks for me and other users of Torque. Turbo Tom has a fix for this; buy a SCT Xcal3 and his service, and toss out this silly Torque thing. Someday I hope to do that, but until that day, I will be putzing around with Torque and LiveLink. The only positive for me is that Torque Pro ($5) and my OBD bluetooth adapter ($15) has me in the game for 20 bucks... however, If I am unable to get some good analysis and detect car problems while using Torque, I will have to admit that I was never really in the game. With or without data-logging, Torque has its' uses, value, and provides some decent tools for those of us without an SCT xcal tuner.