Quote:
Originally Posted by kam327
You know I accepted that at face value from you guys a while back but I found this on Ford's media site. Doesn't seem to jive.
From: http://media.ford.com/article_displa...rticle_id=2574
Adaptive Transmission Control (ATC)
What it is: The Adaptive Transmission Control system recognizes individual styles of driving (e.g., aggressive vs. Relaxed) and adapts transmission shift parameters accordingly. Two types of ATC are adaptive shift-scheduling and adaptive shift-quality control. Adaptive shift scheduling uses information to assess driving style and decides when to upshift or downshift. It also can identify uphill or downhill gradients and recognize hard cornering. This helps inhibit shifts that might be annoying to the driver or affect vehicle stability. Adaptive shift-quality control uses information about the vehicle or environment, such as changes in the transmission due to wear, to improve the quality of shifts. This system can also adjust shift smoothness to suit driving style (e.g., crisper shifts for aggressive driving or smoother shifts for normal driving). How it works: Adaptive Shift Scheduling uses a microprocessor to read signals from various sensors. It uses a complex algorithm and ongoing memory to decide when to shift. For example, high lateral acceleration during cornering may prevent shifting even if the accelerator is suddenly depressed or released. This helps avoid potential loss of tire grip due to load reversal. Shift points can be based on calibration curves in memory. Adaptive shift-quality control adjusts parameters that affect the speed and smoothness of the shift by interpreting data, including driveline feedback from various sensors, as well as post shift parameters. Customer benefit: Improves shift consistency and transmission durability and allows for shifting that is better suited to specific driver styles or operating conditions. Ford status: Available on many North American vehicles.
|
So far I'm not seeing the "customer benefit" of improved transmission durability (not when that grinding noise happens!), but the DCT is by and large smoother - save for when the grinding occurs. Then it's anything but smooth. (And it's inconsistent, making me believe the system legitimately is adaptive.)
But, and I've yet to do my own research to confirm, if the same design is used in Europe and they don't have people clamoring over problems, all things being equal, what are the differences in the US side... and why were they made since it suggests any US-centric changes are (likely) behind these problems...