MPG inconsistencies (answered!) - Page 2 - Ford Focus Forum, Ford Focus ST Forum
Ford Focus Forum
HomeContact UsAbout UsGalleryDiscussion ForumsMarketplace


Go Back   Ford Focus Forum, Ford Focus ST Forum > Ford Focus Third Generation > MK3 Focus

MK3 Focus The place to chat about general questions, window tinting, exterior body, interior and lighting upgrades for the third generation 2012-Current Focus.

Search This Forum | Image Search | Advanced Search    
Ford Focus Tire & Wheels FocusFanatics Merchandise

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 01-06-2013, 05:58 PM   #11
dan50
Focus Addict
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Fan#: 91789
Location: Too much info, IL
What I Drive: 2012 SEL White Platinum 5 Dr 302A

Posts: 1,166
Points 2,801, Level 32
Points: 2,801, Level: 32 Points: 2,801, Level: 32 Points: 2,801, Level: 32
Level Up 34% Completed
Level up: 34% Level up: 34% Level up: 34%
Forum Activity 1%
Activity: 1% Activity: 1% Activity: 1%
FF Reputation: 11 dan50 Great Standing Member
Buy-Sell-Trade Rating: (0)
Quote:
Originally Posted by felixdd View Post
Even for a manual?
Sure think so. Fuel is turned back on at a certain rpm point for either trans so the engine doesn't stall when the clutch is depressed or you arrive at a stop. While the strategy probably varies somewhat, the basics are the same.
dan50 is offline  
    Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Old 01-07-2013, 05:41 AM   #12
doublej
Focus Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Fan#: 100611
Location: caledonia ,ontario, Canada
What I Drive: 2012, yellow blaze, SE Sport hatch

Posts: 50
Points 29, Level 1
Points: 29, Level: 1 Points: 29, Level: 1 Points: 29, Level: 1
Level Up 58% Completed
Level up: 58% Level up: 58% Level up: 58%
Forum Activity 0%
Activity: 0% Activity: 0% Activity: 0%
FF Reputation: 0 doublej Newbie
Buy-Sell-Trade Rating: (0)
Hello "suss6052", your calculations might change if you use the right conversion factor.... 4.54 litres to a imperial gallon compared to your US gallon which is only 3.78 litres.
doublej is offline  
    Reply With Quote
Old 01-07-2013, 05:47 AM   #13
suss6052
Focus Addict
 
suss6052's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Fan#: 95752
Location: ..., MI
What I Drive: 2013 Ford Focus ST2 Ingot Silver

Posts: 12,574
Points 9,571, Level 65
Points: 9,571, Level: 65 Points: 9,571, Level: 65 Points: 9,571, Level: 65
Level Up 74% Completed
Level up: 74% Level up: 74% Level up: 74%
Forum Activity 34%
Activity: 34% Activity: 34% Activity: 34%
FF Reputation: 24 suss6052 Great Standing Member
Buy-Sell-Trade Rating: (3)
Quote:
Originally Posted by doublej View Post
Hello "suss6052", your calculations might change if you use the right conversion factor.... 4.54 litres to a imperial gallon compared to your US gallon which is only 3.78 litres.
The calculation is correct even if I wrote down a slightly lower number for the imperial gallon, the point wasn't the specific size so much as it was the fact that the imperial gallon contains 20% more volume and therefore the published figures are 20% apart before accounting for differences in test methodologies.

Therefore subtracting the energy difference (a factor of 20%) the only remaining difference is that of the tests run to get the fuel economy figures.
__________________
Moderator for: DURATEC Ti-VCT Performance, ST Performance, MK3 Focus
suss6052 is online now  
    Reply With Quote
Old 01-07-2013, 06:35 AM   #14
kam327
-----<M>-----
 
kam327's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Fan#: 94700
Location: Tampa, FL
What I Drive: '14 Ruby Ti w/ Handling Pkg

Posts: 2,396
Points 5,811, Level 49
Points: 5,811, Level: 49 Points: 5,811, Level: 49 Points: 5,811, Level: 49
Level Up 31% Completed
Level up: 31% Level up: 31% Level up: 31%
Forum Activity 5%
Activity: 5% Activity: 5% Activity: 5%
FF Reputation: 11 kam327 Great Standing Member
Buy-Sell-Trade Rating: (0)
Quote:
Originally Posted by felixdd View Post
That makes more sense then. Crazy canuck/euro testing

Does the "don't coaset in neutral" thing apply for manual cars too then?
The US EPA rating system changed in '08 and used to be more optimistic too. The '07 Focus window sticker said 27/34, but the "new" ratings (under the '08 system) on fueleconomy.gov are 23/31. That would suggest that the '12 Focus manual would be rated at 29/39 under the old system, much closer to the current Canadian rating of 30/42.
kam327 is offline  
    Reply With Quote
Old 01-07-2013, 08:56 AM   #15
c5karl
Focus Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Fan#: 105687
Location: Fairfax, VA
What I Drive: 2013 Hatchback SE, 5-speed, silver

Posts: 64
Points 65, Level 1
Points: 65, Level: 1 Points: 65, Level: 1 Points: 65, Level: 1
Level Up 30% Completed
Level up: 30% Level up: 30% Level up: 30%
Forum Activity 1%
Activity: 1% Activity: 1% Activity: 1%
FF Reputation: 1 c5karl Good Standing Member
Buy-Sell-Trade Rating: (0)
Quote:
Originally Posted by dan50 View Post
This has been said before, but to maximize fuel economy don't coast in neutral. While this seems counterintuitive, when coasting in gear fuel supply is generally cut-off as the mechanical connection to the wheels keeps the engine "running". If you shift to neutral, fuel has to be supplied to accomplish the same thing. This won't make a big difference, but manufacturers engineer it this way for a reason.
I've seen this mentioned on this forum several times, but are we sure the Focus has this feature? This Ford document, dated last June, does not list the Focus as one of the cars with ADFSO.

http://media.ford.com/images/10031/Ford_Tech_Fuel.pdf
c5karl is offline  
    Reply With Quote
Old 01-07-2013, 09:08 AM   #16
dan50
Focus Addict
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Fan#: 91789
Location: Too much info, IL
What I Drive: 2012 SEL White Platinum 5 Dr 302A

Posts: 1,166
Points 2,801, Level 32
Points: 2,801, Level: 32 Points: 2,801, Level: 32 Points: 2,801, Level: 32
Level Up 34% Completed
Level up: 34% Level up: 34% Level up: 34%
Forum Activity 1%
Activity: 1% Activity: 1% Activity: 1%
FF Reputation: 11 dan50 Great Standing Member
Buy-Sell-Trade Rating: (0)
Quote:
Originally Posted by c5karl View Post
I've seen this mentioned on this forum several times, but are we sure the Focus has this feature? This Ford document, dated last June, does not list the Focus as one of the cars with ADFSO.

http://media.ford.com/images/10031/Ford_Tech_Fuel.pdf
Maybe it doesn't. I thought this feature was almost universal but maybe not. Seems odd that Ford would go through the trouble of installing active grille shutters and not this, but maybe it's harder to implement on cars with manual gearboxes or DCTs. There are are posts here that seem to conclude the Focus has this feature, but maybe it isn't the "aggressive" fuel cut-off described in the Ford document.
dan50 is offline  
    Reply With Quote
Old 01-07-2013, 09:24 AM   #17
suss6052
Focus Addict
 
suss6052's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Fan#: 95752
Location: ..., MI
What I Drive: 2013 Ford Focus ST2 Ingot Silver

Posts: 12,574
Points 9,571, Level 65
Points: 9,571, Level: 65 Points: 9,571, Level: 65 Points: 9,571, Level: 65
Level Up 74% Completed
Level up: 74% Level up: 74% Level up: 74%
Forum Activity 34%
Activity: 34% Activity: 34% Activity: 34%
FF Reputation: 24 suss6052 Great Standing Member
Buy-Sell-Trade Rating: (3)
Quote:
Originally Posted by c5karl View Post
I've seen this mentioned on this forum several times, but are we sure the Focus has this feature? This Ford document, dated last June, does not list the Focus as one of the cars with ADFSO.

http://media.ford.com/images/10031/Ford_Tech_Fuel.pdf
Quote:
Originally Posted by dan50 View Post
Maybe it doesn't. I thought this feature was almost universal but maybe not. Seems odd that Ford would go through the trouble of installing active grille shutters and not this, but maybe it's harder to implement on cars with manual gearboxes or DCTs. Learn something new every day...
That is an old and incomplete list of specific vehicles mentioned that have ADFSO, its basically already been confirmed that the 2012+ Focus does infact have ADFSO based on scangauge readings and reports from Ford engineers.

This was discussed at length here: http://www.focusfanatics.com/forum/showthread.php?t=281522
__________________
Moderator for: DURATEC Ti-VCT Performance, ST Performance, MK3 Focus
suss6052 is online now  
    Reply With Quote
Old 01-07-2013, 10:17 AM   #18
kam327
-----<M>-----
 
kam327's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Fan#: 94700
Location: Tampa, FL
What I Drive: '14 Ruby Ti w/ Handling Pkg

Posts: 2,396
Points 5,811, Level 49
Points: 5,811, Level: 49 Points: 5,811, Level: 49 Points: 5,811, Level: 49
Level Up 31% Completed
Level up: 31% Level up: 31% Level up: 31%
Forum Activity 5%
Activity: 5% Activity: 5% Activity: 5%
FF Reputation: 11 kam327 Great Standing Member
Buy-Sell-Trade Rating: (0)
Quote:
Originally Posted by c5karl View Post
I've seen this mentioned on this forum several times, but are we sure the Focus has this feature? This Ford document, dated last June, does not list the Focus as one of the cars with ADFSO.

http://media.ford.com/images/10031/Ford_Tech_Fuel.pdf
Also the 2013 Source Book says we have it.
kam327 is offline  
    Reply With Quote
Old 01-08-2013, 11:35 PM   #19
thisisbenji
Focus Enthusiast
 
thisisbenji's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Fan#: 102558
Location: Wadsworth, IL
What I Drive: 2012 Red SE

Posts: 183
Points 674, Level 13
Points: 674, Level: 13 Points: 674, Level: 13 Points: 674, Level: 13
Level Up 48% Completed
Level up: 48% Level up: 48% Level up: 48%
Forum Activity 1%
Activity: 1% Activity: 1% Activity: 1%
FF Reputation: 2 thisisbenji Good Standing Member
Buy-Sell-Trade Rating: (0)
Quote:
Originally Posted by felixdd View Post
Even for a manual?
Yup. For the first few years I drove manual (in my 95 civic 1.6l vtec) I would coast in N to stops. I averaged about 34-36 MPG, yet when I started downshifting to a stop my mileage instantly shot up to above 40 MPG every tank usually at about 42. The cool thing about that car is you could feel the exact RPM that the ECU started to give the car fuel as the RPMs fell. So if I was coasting to a stop in 3rd gear I could feel when the fuel came back on, I would downshift just before that point.

I miss that car (my younger sister has it now), I might try to steal it back. The gas mileage was so much better than the Focus.
__________________
2014 Focus ST2 | Race Red
2012 Focus SE Sport | Race Red | DCT | Steeda RSB - SOLD
thisisbenji is offline  
    Reply With Quote
Old 01-09-2013, 08:03 AM   #20
c5karl
Focus Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Fan#: 105687
Location: Fairfax, VA
What I Drive: 2013 Hatchback SE, 5-speed, silver

Posts: 64
Points 65, Level 1
Points: 65, Level: 1 Points: 65, Level: 1 Points: 65, Level: 1
Level Up 30% Completed
Level up: 30% Level up: 30% Level up: 30%
Forum Activity 1%
Activity: 1% Activity: 1% Activity: 1%
FF Reputation: 1 c5karl Good Standing Member
Buy-Sell-Trade Rating: (0)
Quote:
Originally Posted by thisisbenji View Post
The gas mileage was so much better than the Focus.
According to Edmunds:

1995 Honda Civic sedan curb weight: 2313 lbs.
2013 Ford Focus sedan curb weight: 2907 lbs.

The '13 Fiesta is closer in weight and size to the '95 Civic than either the '13 Focus or the '13 Civic. Probably would get you similar fuel economy, too. Newtonian physics still rule the day.
c5karl is offline  
    Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks & Social Networks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:24 PM.


Copyright 2002-2014 FocusFanatics.com. All Rights Reserved : Terms of Use : Privacy Policy : Advertise Information

Focus Fanatics Ford Focus Forum offers many fun ways for you to engage with other Ford Focus Owners from across the world. Whether it be about the aftermarket performance modifications, technical how-to's, European tuned suspension or awesome fuel economy similar to the Acura TLX or Fiesta ST. You can find all Ford Focus and Focus ST related information here. Join our Ford Focus discussion forums and chat with local Focus enthusiasts in your area.