Photographers Thread - Post your work

[YellowJellyBean]

Originally Posted by mikebontoft

lol looks like you also figured out how to clone trees

What does that mean?

[mix1983]

^^lyonsroar's edit of the Subaru photo

[lyonsroar]

Originally Posted by mikebontoft

lol looks like you also figured out how to clone trees

Directed to me about that rally Subaru pic?

That's the thing with content aware fill. It's gonna grab bits and pieces from the areas around the fill area. Occasionally it grabs whole objects like a tree. The trick is changing the just enough so it looks natural. Avoid straight lines and repeating patterns. That kind of thing isn't found in nature.

[misfire]

[soundFocus]

No idea why exactly this film I used is showing so much grain. It also seems focused awfully sharp. Hope it's not a problem with the scanner as I just bought the thing. I know it wasn't the shot/lens as the prints were good, and you can see the definition in the clouds ruling out issues there. Might just start using Kodak Extar all the time now instead of cheap bulk Fuji/Kodak. On the plus side I think I'm getting a little better grip on adjusting color and lighting in PSE. Shot with a Canonet QL17 GIII (had a bad light meter, used a hand held to set exposure)

[Malibooya]

^ Interesting. What's your ISO speed on those?

Here's one more of mine from the beach.


Balestriere_HiddenNYC_14 by Vincent Balestriere, on Flickr

[tukaniSVT]

^^ Nice. I would have liked the silhoueete of the man and the rods to be away from the city horizon, but other than that. Nice shot.

-Ray-

[Malibooya]

Thanks Ray. I like this one better, posted it a few pages back:


Fisherman_Silhouette by Vincent Balestriere, on Flickr

[soundFocus]

Originally Posted by Malibooya

^ Interesting. What's your ISO speed on those?

Here's one more of mine from the beach.


Balestriere_HiddenNYC_14 by Vincent Balestriere, on Flickr

Nice pictures, love the color in them. My ISO Speed was 200. I'd normally say I somehow didn't set the color/lighting right in PSE but it's still visible in the unmodified images too:

I don't think it's the scanner either, because I ran some more through it as a test and those came out fine. Thus I'm leaning towards just low quality film; I typically shoot cheap bulk film, in this case Fuji, through cameras that I'm just testing, but I've never had the grain show up like that.

[lyonsroar]

IMG_1080_wm by Lyonsroar91, on Flickr