|
||||||||
|
Auto Cross, Drag Racing, Car Show, Awards & Prizes - Register Now! |
||||||||
|
|||||||
MK3 Focus The place to chat about general questions, window tinting, exterior body, interior and lighting upgrades for the third generation 2012-Current Focus.
|
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#61 | ||||
|
Focus Jr. Enthusiast
|
would this setup work for those of us that have the automatic manual transmission, or would these upgrades only work on "stick" manuals?
Last edited by Veion315; 11-13-2011 at 04:59 AM. |
||||
|
|
|
|
|
#62 | ||||
|
Focus Fanatic
|
Should work for everyone.
__________________
2012 SGM SEL Sedan 303a w/o Nav Job 1 built 6/2011 |
||||
|
|
|
|
|
#63 | ||||
|
Focus Addict
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
#64 | ||||
|
Focus Fanatic
|
Good point. They're probably not going to stand up to the same beating the manual tranny would.
__________________
2012 SGM SEL Sedan 303a w/o Nav Job 1 built 6/2011 |
||||
|
|
|
|
|
#65 | ||||
|
I like cake
|
I'm in love.
__________________
February 2005 ROTM 2011 Yellow Blaze Fiesta SES 2013 Taffeta White Civic Si sedan Focus Fanatics Forum Rules Ride of the Month Showcase & Voting Center |
||||
|
|
|
|
|
#66 | ||||
|
Focus Enthusiast
|
I would never pay that much for a focus. Don't get me wrong, I love my car but I purchased it for the milage. If performance was my goal, 35k would buy a nice Mustang GT. I don't see how a hotter focus makes sense, different strokes for different folks I guess.
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
#67 | ||||
|
Focus Enthusiast
|
Quote:
when i want to go fast (again) i'll get a vehicle made for it. not knocking on the foci, i like it for what *i* got it for. |
||||
|
|
|
|
|
#68 | ||||
|
Focus Fanatic
|
Quote:
__________________
2012 SGM SEL Sedan 303a w/o Nav Job 1 built 6/2011 |
||||
|
|
|
|
|
#69 | ||||
|
Focus Enthusiast
|
Quote:
yes the focus is a more practical vehicle by design than the mustang. but once you order an st or roush, performance is the goal... not practicality. and if that's the case, get the ford that's designed for that. comparing the focus to a mustang is comparing apples to elephants. both have different uses and making one try to do what the other does is impractical for both. this is just my humble opinion, no one will be right or wrong... my logic tells me to get a focus for practicality, get a pony car for performance. it's true i can get a performance version of the focus, but i don't think i'll be satisfied the way i would if i would've gotten the vehicle made for the job (within my means... sorry no ford gt for me ).
__________________
...SLOFOFO... 2012 Platinum White Tri-Coat Metallic Titanium 401A, Winter Package, Sport Package, Park Tech. Package, Power Moonroof, MFT/HD Sirius/Nav |
||||
|
|
|
|
|
#70 | ||||
|
Focus Fanatic
|
Quote:
It's a good trade-off between performance and practicality, much like the Mazdaspeed 3 is. It's still a hatchback, but it's not by any means slow anymore. It's a hot hatch, some upscale amenities, but you can still punch it and move. It's a car for a weekday dad (or mom) and a weekend warrior (light track use, spirited driving, etc.) without leaving you wanting more if it fits your niche. It's more practical than buying a Focus and a Mustang separately for the same goals. So I agree in the sense that the mustang is the clear cut sports car winner and the focus is the clear cut economy car winner, but when you want just that middle of the road, little bit of both, you can opt for the ST or tack on the Roush package. Like I said, it's kind of a niche thing.
__________________
2012 SGM SEL Sedan 303a w/o Nav Job 1 built 6/2011 |
||||
|
|
|
|
| Bookmarks & Social Networks |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
|
||||