Less Fuel? - Ford Focus Forum, Ford Focus ST Forum
Ford Focus Forum
HomeContact UsAbout UsGalleryDiscussion ForumsMarketplace


Go Back   Ford Focus Forum, Ford Focus ST Forum > Ford Focus Tech Discussions > Focus Tuning Chat

Focus Tuning Chat Discuss performance tuning options for your Ford Focus.

Search This Forum | Image Search | Advanced Search    
Ford Focus Tire & Wheels FocusFanatics Merchandise

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 03-10-2011, 05:05 PM   #1
blackbumpinfocus93
Focus Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Fan#: 80510
Location: Carpentersville, IL
What I Drive: 2009 Black SES Sedan

Posts: 209
FF Reputation: 2 blackbumpinfocus93 Good Standing Member
Buy-Sell-Trade Rating: (0)
Less Fuel?

hi all! idk if anyone has noticed but the SCT X3 ECU Flasher motto is "More Power! Less Fuel". I understand the More Power! part but nobody ever talks about the Less Fuel part. To me thats a big selling point and I was just wondering if anyone has this particular flasher and could tell me if they actually are getting better fuel economy.



__________________
Team Duratec #61
Sedan Revolution #134
2008+ SES #017
"Doing a drag race in an automatic is like running a 100M sprint in your wellies, full of tadpoles."- Jeremy Clarkson
blackbumpinfocus93 is offline  
    Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Old 03-11-2011, 01:11 AM   #2
iminhell
C2H5OH
 
iminhell's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Fan#: 36222
Location: Darwin, MN
What I Drive: 2000 & 2001 ZX3's

Posts: 10,690
Points 18,269, Level 85
Points: 18,269, Level: 85 Points: 18,269, Level: 85 Points: 18,269, Level: 85
Level Up 84% Completed
Level up: 84% Level up: 84% Level up: 84%
Forum Activity 16%
Activity: 16% Activity: 16% Activity: 16%
FF Reputation: 48 iminhell Great Standing Member
Buy-Sell-Trade Rating: (4)
Not speaking for them, just generalizing.

'Less fuel' can be somewhat of an ambiguous term. The general public doesn't understand the difference between better fuel economy and better MPG's. Fuel economy is the mass amount of fuel required to produce X hp. MPG's are how far you go on a gallon of fuel. The two aren't necessarily related.
*pulling #'s out of my ass
Take a Geo Metro and a Chevy P/U. The Metro got around 45 MPG and made 50hp. The Chevy truck gets about 17 MPG and makes 300hp. 50 divided by 45 = 1.1. 300 divided by 17 = 17.6. Meaning that per gallon used the Chevy is more fuel efficient than a Metro. Even though the Metro gets better MPG's, most all of which has to do with weight of the vehicles. The best example of a good balance I can think of is a newer Corvette. 400 some odd hp and you can get 30+ MPG highway with them pretty easily. Very efficient car in all regards.

Long winded but what all that means is the SCT may be thinking efficiency vs MPG. Though it is possible to improve both if you find the right tuner to help you.
For example if you wanted better highway MPG's you could tune leaner closed loop or back off the timing a bit. I can't recall the numbers off hand but there is a formula to find how many hp it takes to sustain a certain speed. IIRC 60mph is something like 30hp for the average newer car. So it doesn't take a ton of power but you need enough or the engine luggs and you end up using more fuel.
__________________
Don't "think outside the box".
There is no box.
Do it correct, or do it twice.
iminhell is offline  
    Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Old 03-12-2011, 04:42 AM   #3
illinipo
Token Engin-nerd
 
illinipo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Fan#: 37693
Location: Well wouldn't you like to know?, Not Listed
What I Drive: dirty wag; Party; Bavarian phallus

Posts: 3,408
FF Reputation: 272 illinipo Outstanding Standing Member illinipo Outstanding Standing Member illinipo Outstanding Standing Member
Buy-Sell-Trade Rating: (19)
Quote:
Originally Posted by iminhell View Post
back off the timing a bit.
Nope! In general the same things that help power also help fuel economy. It is a game of efficiency. The glaring outlier to this statement is open loop afr, obviously.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dennis_Grant
Remember this list: Bilstein; Penske; Koni; Ohlins; Sachs; Dynamic Suspension.

Not on this list? Almost certainly crap.
SUV this!
illinipo is offline  
    Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Reply

Bookmarks & Social Networks

Quick Reply
Message:
Options

Register Now

In order to be able to post messages on the Ford Focus Forum, Ford Focus ST Forum forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.
User Name:
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.
Password:
Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.
Email Address:

Log-in

Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.



Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:52 AM.


Copyright 2002-2014 FocusFanatics.com. All Rights Reserved : Privacy Policy : Advertise Information

Focus Fanatics Ford Focus Forum offers many fun ways for you to engage with other Ford Focus Owners from across the world. Whether it be about the aftermarket performance modifications, technical how-to's, European tuned suspension or awesome fuel economy similar to the Cadillac ATS-V, Ford Fusion and Acura TLX. You can find all Ford Focus and Focus ST related information here. Join our Ford Focus discussion forums and chat with local Focus enthusiasts in your area.