Originally Posted by kylesvt720
I totally agree that's probably the case. I'm just saying there is no way to prove it without pulling a stock engine and putting it on an engine dyno.
Right, so why argue the estimated crank numbers as you did in post #53? Your method of calculation is equally as bogus as FocusBoy58s--by assuming that Ford numbers are correct, rather than assuming a typical parasitic loss, as FocusBoy58 was. You were willing at that point, and up until your latest post, to estimate without putting it on an engine dyno.