Originally posted by 2000blackzx3 Yeah that's the only reason I was thinking of for such a high speed, his launch must have been REALLY bad.
lol... extremely. Imagine how happy i was until i saw the timeslip. we were neck and neck till about a lil past half way (i actually got a better 1/8) and then his third gear pulled reeeeal nice on me
04-06-2005 09:50 PM
Yeah that's the only reason I was thinking of for such a high speed, his launch must have been REALLY bad.
04-06-2005 09:41 PM
Originally posted by 2000blackzx3 Do you mean 16.2 @ 85 mph? 95 seems fast
Originally posted by fokuzx3 that mustang prob wasnt gettin ne traction
fokuz is right, he sucked balls on the launch like me. We talked afterwards and he said it was his first time on the track with his mustang (same with me in the focus) and he said he was just experimenting with the launches
04-06-2005 09:31 PM
that mustang prob wasnt gettin ne traction..i had a 16.3@89 cuz i was sliding all over the place and finnaly hooked up in third.so i had a good top end.then when i got some drag radials i got a 15.5-big difference.
in my old vet, once i got a 16.67@96 cuz i missed second and just cruized the rest of the way..same thing, just cuz you end with a fast time doesnt mean you got there fast you know what i mean?torqy cars might end at a lower mph but still have good 1/4 numbers
04-06-2005 09:25 PM
Do you mean 16.2 @ 85 mph? 95 seems fast
04-06-2005 09:16 PM
the numbers look good, but yeah, the MPH seems off... i got a 16.5@86mph and the mustang i raced got a 16.2@95mph
04-06-2005 09:10 PM
I see, I'll need to make some more runs to get more realistic numbers, but it gives me an idea of the times.
04-06-2005 09:04 PM
My car has more mods than yours (I/H/E) and taps 81-82 mph consistently. 87 mph would be indicative of a 15 second quarter mile. Either it measured the distance wrong, or something else is up.
04-06-2005 07:27 PM
Ok, but I remember checking the speedo right at the end of the quartermile, and it was right on 140 km/h...
04-06-2005 07:13 PM
MPH is way off, but the rest of it seems fairly accurate.
This thread has more than 10 replies.
Click here to review the whole thread.