|09-23-2012 11:11 AM|
|VEGAS||I believe the head is same, if a head would have a sensor it wont mean the 2.0L would need to plug it in to work. I took out the 2.)l engine and installed the 2.3L and have no spare ware harness plugs I can see|
|09-23-2012 11:07 AM|
|VEGAS||if you install a OEM 2.3L manifold you need to swap the wire harness and ECU,|
|09-23-2012 09:29 AM|
|badazz2010focus||Doesn't the 2.3 NOT have that CHT sensor?|
|09-23-2012 08:42 AM|
|09-22-2012 02:22 PM|
|VEGAS||the intake ports are tiny bit larger ( might no even notice it with the eye) but the 2.0L will bolt up with no issues.|
|09-22-2012 02:19 PM|
|09-22-2012 02:17 PM|
Ports a little bigger, but the head over all is same..
it will bolt up just like the 2.0L
I mention this so if you need to use the 2.0L as a CORE they will accept it
|09-22-2012 01:58 PM|
so the ports aren't even bigger? that's why I'd assume the 23 IM is required... to get the most benefit from enlarged ports for a higher cfm.
how much does it drop the CR if you don't mill the head?
|09-22-2012 01:51 PM|
|VEGAS||i contacted a guy, he said head is same head, just valves cut larger on 2.3L|
|09-20-2012 11:22 AM|
i know for a fact it works, and I feel the huge difference in power with 2.3L engine compared to 2.0L even while using the 2.0L intake.
Maybe I will see a huge gain when I add the cozzy knockoff
|This thread has more than 10 replies. Click here to review the whole thread.|