|02-21-2013 11:07 AM|
I'm on the fence with exhaust but I'd be more keen (yes, keen) on the 2.5 as 2.25 just isn't that much of an increase but $$$ For now, I've been enjoying a very quiet ride!
I had a quasi 3" exhaust for my Mazdaspeed6 when I first bought it used. It was loud but it did have a very nice low note and actually helped spool up compared to stock mufflers with a 3" downpipe.
|02-17-2013 09:44 PM|
|02-17-2013 03:55 PM|
I certainly felt no torque loss on my 2.5" exhaust.
To me it sounded like companies that chose to go with 2.25" exhausts were doing so for better sound quality (at least in their opinion) and sound level.
|02-16-2013 05:58 PM|
|Creative||2.5 is by far the best from my point of view. The fswerks feels great.|
|02-16-2013 03:50 PM|
|_RED_||I agree with focusboy, and check the dyno thread to see numbers. Myself I am running a 2.5 and noticed no low end TQ loss if anything I gain some low end tq|
|02-16-2013 12:32 PM|
Duratecs make the best power on 2.5" to 3" Maximum exhaust size. I went from 2.5" to 3" header back and bumped me up from 176 to 183whp, tq only increased very slightly but the torque was still a table top 140-157wtq from 2500 and up.
If you are going to spend the money get a 2.5" system period. trust me.
|02-16-2013 12:08 AM|
|ToreadorFocus||i personally have chosen the fswerks 2.5" race|
|02-16-2013 12:07 AM|
|ripto||Good to know. I don't plan on doing those type of mods, sounds like 2.25" will be my sweet spot.|
|02-16-2013 12:03 AM|
|LOADED||2.25'' will be ideal If you don't plan on going Forced induction or moderate to high engine work Ex: Heads or cams.|
|02-15-2013 06:00 PM|
|ripto||Thanks for the info. What would you say are the RPM values separating low, mid, and high?|
|This thread has more than 10 replies. Click here to review the whole thread.|