EPA Examining Ford C-Max, Fusion Hybrid Fuel Economy Claims - Ford Focus Forum, Ford Focus ST Forum, Ford Focus RS Forum
Ford Focus Forum
HomeContact UsAbout UsGalleryDiscussion ForumsMarketplace

Go Back   Ford Focus Forum, Ford Focus ST Forum, Ford Focus RS Forum > Ford Focus Discussions > General Car Chat Lounge

General Car Chat Lounge Discussion Forum relating to nonspecific Ford Focus models, car purchasing, auto industry news and any car talk.

Search This Forum | Image Search | Advanced Search    

LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 12-10-2012, 01:40 PM   #1
Join Date: Nov 2006
Fan#: 41389
Location: FocusFanatics.com, CA
Posts: 1,496
Points 47,632, Level 100
Points: 47,632, Level: 100 Points: 47,632, Level: 100 Points: 47,632, Level: 100
Level Up 0% Completed
Level up: 0% Level up: 0% Level up: 0%
Forum Activity 6%
Activity: 6% Activity: 6% Activity: 6%
FF Reputation: 3 FFTeam Good Standing Member
Buy-Sell-Trade Rating: (0)
EPA Examining Ford C-Max, Fusion Hybrid Fuel Economy Claims

Just the Facts:
-Ford's C-Max and Fusion Hybrids both were rated at 47 mpg in the EPA's city, highway and combined driving test cycles.
-Consumers tell Edmunds and others that the EPA mileage is unobtainable.
-Now the EPA is reviewing Ford data in the wake of the recent rollback of Hyundai and Kia fuel-efficiency claims.

Concerned about consumer and media reports that Ford Motor Co.'s claimed 47 mpg fuel efficiency for its new C-Max and Fusion hybrids is a seemingly unobtainable goal, the federal Environmental Protection Agency has begun a review of test data for the two models, Edmunds has learned.

The review comes less than a month after the agency ordered Korean automakers Hyundai and Kia to roll back fuel-efficiency claims for 13 of their models.

Although manufacturer testing error is being blamed for the Hyundai and Kia fuel-efficiency foul-ups, that situation being followed so closely by the apparent Ford hybrid discrepancies focuses new attention on the well-known but generally ignored fact that the EPA's ratings typically overstate a vehicle's fuel efficiency.

Because the agency's testing cannot control for all real-world driving situations and climate conditions, federal reports and most independent reviewers discount EPA ratings by at least 20 percent when translating tested fuel-efficiency ratings into the fuel economy consumers can expect to get in their own driving.

In Ford's case, the discrepancies are in that ballpark. Consumer Reports magazine, whose recent test of the two hybrids sparked the review, found that the best it could do with the new C-Max Hybrid was 37 mpg combined city and highway driving — 21 percent below the EA rating — while the 2013 Fusion Hybrid came in at 39 mpg, a 17 percent discrepancy.

The magazine wasn't the first to discover the difficulties in achieving 47 mpg with the cars. Although dissatisfaction with the models' mileage isn't universal, many C-Max Hybrid buyers using Edmunds.com's forums have been complaining since it when on sale earlier this year that they couldn't get close to 47 mpg; there are similar complaints about the Fusion Hybrid.

Edmunds.com's own test-drivers were unable to do better than a combined average of 33 mpg in the C-Max hybrid over almost 400 miles of driving in varied Southern California conditions.

An EPA review of test data on the two Fords doesn't mean that there is an impropriety in the testing procedure but could signal that the agency is beginning to reconsider the design of its own tests and how they are applied.

Most vehicles today are tested by the manufacturers using EPA procedures — the agency hasn't the budget or manpower to do its own testing of every new vehicle each year but says it does spot-check about 15 percent of the total.

Ford said it is aware of the EPA's review and intends to cooperate fully with the agency. The company also said that early reviews by consumers show that some are able to meet or exceed the 47 mpg rating for both the C-Max and Fusion Hybrid and that the various reviews finding that goal unobtainable merely illustrate that there are many factors that can cause mileage to vary.

Edmunds says: Is it unfortunate that this comes just four days after Ford issued a report saying that winning consumer trust would be the big issue for the coming year?

Text Source:Edmunds.com

Account Administration

Check Out FocusRSClub.com

Last edited by warneej; 12-13-2012 at 01:57 PM.
FFTeam is offline  
    Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Sponsored Links
Old 12-10-2012, 04:11 PM   #2
Focus Fanatic
GhiaFan's Avatar
Join Date: Sep 2007
Fan#: 50498
Location: Tallinn, Estonia
What I Drive: 2012 1.6L 125hp Titanium wagon

Posts: 2,206
Points 130,503, Level 100
Points: 130,503, Level: 100 Points: 130,503, Level: 100 Points: 130,503, Level: 100
Level Up 0% Completed
Level up: 0% Level up: 0% Level up: 0%
Forum Activity 8%
Activity: 8% Activity: 8% Activity: 8%
FF Reputation: 24 GhiaFan Great Standing Member
Buy-Sell-Trade Rating: (0)
Bravo. I predict the EPA will find that Ford has followed the EPA testing requirements to the "T" which in turn will make Consumer Reports look like the jack asses that IMO are.

CR must be fishing for new subscribers :-)
GhiaFan is offline  
    Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

Bookmarks & Social Networks

Quick Reply

Register Now

In order to be able to post messages on the Ford Focus Forum, Ford Focus ST Forum, Ford Focus RS Forum forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.
User Name:
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.
Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.
Email Address:
What I Drive
Year, color, and model of your car. Example: 2003 Pitch Black ZX3
Your real name.
Please select your insurance company (Optional)


Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:35 AM.

Copyright 2002-2015 FocusFanatics.com. All Rights Reserved : Privacy Policy : Advertise Information

Focus Fanatics Ford Focus Forum offers many fun ways for you to engage with other Ford Focus Owners from across the world. Whether it be about the aftermarket performance modifications, technical how-to's, European tuned suspension or awesome fuel economy similar to the Mazda CX-3, Audi S3, Mazda MX-5 Miata and Acura TLX. You can find all Ford Focus, Focus ST and Focus RS related information here. Join our Ford Focus discussion forums and chat with local Focus enthusiasts in your area. If you own other makes have a look at Challenger Hellcat Forum, Charger Hellcat Forum, Cadillac ATS-V Forum, Cadillac CTS-V Forum, Lexus RC-F Forum, Lexus GS-F Forum, Mercedes GLA Forum, Mercedes GLE Forum and Volvo XC90 Forum.


Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.1