Ford Focus Forum, Ford Focus ST Forum, Ford Focus RS Forum - View Single Post - 2005-07 more reliable than 2000-04
View Single Post
Old 12-23-2012, 02:04 PM   #6
iminhell's Avatar
Join Date: Jun 2006
Fan#: 36222
Location: Darwin, MN
What I Drive: 2000 & 2001 ZX3's

Posts: 10,942
Points 19,326, Level 87
Points: 19,326, Level: 87 Points: 19,326, Level: 87 Points: 19,326, Level: 87
Level Up 96% Completed
Level up: 96% Level up: 96% Level up: 96%
Forum Activity 19%
Activity: 19% Activity: 19% Activity: 19%
FF Reputation: 53 iminhell Excellent Standing Member
Buy-Sell-Trade Rating: (4)
Tell your brother he is blasphemous and I will not stand for it!

Rule of thumb,
All cars break (VW's more than others).

Everything, and I mean everything, will boil down to maintenance when looking for used.
There are few early Foci that have had proper suspension repairs done, bushings, tie-rods, ball joints, bearings. Expect to repair them or ware tires fast and uneven. (apparently cutting a tires life in half is cheaper than fixing problems)
With the later ones, you will have the same suspension issues. The difference will be the age of the rubber. But miles can quickly take up the gap as well as geography.

Engine wise, both the duratec and zetec are reliable. It's the parts around them that give issue. If people listen and use Motorcraft replacement parts, they replace them less often and have fewer problems (this has been proven over and over, alternators).
Replacement parts are about the same for both engines.

I guess the duratec is better in that it is chain driven vs the zetec's belt. Less maintenance required,,, which people take to mean no maintenance. The guides do ware and should at minimum be checked near 100,000 miles, no one does.

If it were me, just look for a well maintained, clean, rust free car and call that enough.
121,000 members and still no sponsored racing.
iminhell is online now  
    Reply With Quote